Skip to main content

How it works

From refrigeration signal to prepared action.

PlasmaAudit follows a simple operating loop: see more, learn what is changing, give people clear context, and support the next human decision.

How PlasmaAudit predicts risk

Four steps from live data to early action.

PlasmaAudit does more than react to a single alarm. It evaluates the entire freezer, performs the calculations, compares behavior to its own history, and identifies developing risk while there is still time to act.

  1. 01Monitor
    Capture the whole system

    The up-to-60-sensor system includes dual product probes and freezer-wide equipment sensing.

  2. 02Calculate
    Turn readings into meaning

    Safety margin, Time-to-Limit, superheat, runtime, cycles, and other derived values reveal what raw points cannot.

  3. 03Compare
    Learn what normal looks like

    Every live point and calculation is compared with that freezer's history, baseline, and recurring patterns.

  4. 04Predict
    Flag developing risk early

    Drift, urgency, and likely causes are surfaced before the condition becomes an emergency.

Early action
Plan maintenance days or weeks before a potential emergency call.

Reduce product risk, avoid preventable disruptions, and give every person better evidence for the next decision.

See the warning before the alarm

A complex pattern, explained in plain language.

The customer sees what matters first: whether the product is protected, what is changing, how much time remains, and what to do next. Technical evidence stays one click away.

Illustrative example · sample data

This freezer is drifting from normal.

The product is protected now, but the freezer is working harder and taking longer to recover. PlasmaAudit turns that developing pattern into a clear warning while maintenance can still be planned.

Product status Protected nowDual probes agree and remain in range.
Is the product safe now?Yes

Both product probes agree and remain inside the configured safe range.

What is changing?Cooling is taking longer

The freezer needs more runtime to hold the same product conditions.

How much warning is there?About 12 days

The current trend creates time to investigate before projected risk.

What should happen next?Plan an inspection

Check refrigeration performance during scheduled maintenance.

Eight-day sample viewProduct temperature looks steady. Equipment effort does not.

That gap is the early warning: the freezer is using more effort and taking longer to produce the same safe result.

Compressor runtime
48% → 72%
Recovery time
25 → 42 min
Sensor architecture
2 product + 2 refrigeration
Equipment effortCompressor runtime is rising
Rising
Compressor runtime increased from 48 percent to 72 percent over eight sample daysThe actual runtime trend climbs above the freezer's 48 percent historical-normal line.48% historical normal72%

Scroll the chart for the full scale. Exact values are listed below.

Product protectionFour sensors • two conditions • one drift alert
1 alert
Four sensors on one graph: two product-temperature sensors and two refrigeration sensors, with one drift alertAll four sensor traces share one timeline. The product-temperature pair stays together, the refrigeration primary stays stable, and only the dotted refrigeration redundant sensor separates and triggers one alert.ONE VIEW · 2 CONDITIONS · 2 SENSORS EACHALERT · 1 sensor separation

Scroll the chart for the full scale. Exact values are listed below.

Illustrative readings · relative sample days, not a customer record
DayRuntimeProduct primary °CProduct redundant °CReturn air primary °CReturn air redundant °C
Sample 148%-31.8-31.6-37.8-37.7
Sample 250%-31.7-31.6-37.7-37.7
Sample 352%-31.7-31.5-37.8-37.6
Sample 455%-31.6-31.5-37.7-37.6
Sample 558%-31.6-31.4-37.6-37.5
Sample 662%-31.5-31.4-37.6-37.2
Sample 767%-31.6-31.4-37.5-36.9
Today72%-31.6-31.4-37.5-36.5
Product primary / redundant
-31.6 °C / -31.4 °C
Return air primary / redundant
-37.5 °C / -36.5 °C

Sensor-agreement check: All four sensors share one view: two product-temperature sensors and two refrigeration sensors. Three stay aligned; only one dotted redundant sensor separates, creating one alert. Sensor disagreement calls for checking the probe and its installation; it does not by itself diagnose a refrigeration fault. The separate runtime and recovery example supports a performance inspection. A technician must reconcile both checks.

Early-warning viewAct while the work can still be scheduled.
  1. Historical normal48% runtimeExpected operating pattern
  2. Change detectedRecovery slowingPattern begins moving from normal
  3. Today72% runtimeProduct remains protected
  4. If ignoredRisk in ~12 daysProjected from the developing trend
Recommended next stepSchedule a refrigeration-performance inspection before this becomes an emergency.
Show me the data behind this assessmentTechnical evidence
Dual product probes-31.6 °C / -31.4 °C

Tracking together inside the configured safe range

Compressor runtime72% now / 48% normal

The freezer is working harder to maintain conditions

Temperature recovery42 min now / 25 min normal

Recovery is taking longer than this freezer's baseline

Refrigerant behaviorOutside learned band

The pressure, temperature, and superheat relationship has shifted

Doors and defrostNormal activity

Recent events do not explain the sustained change

Historical comparisonDrift worsening for 8 days

The pattern is persistent rather than a one-time reading

What the pattern means: Product temperature alone still looks safe. The combined runtime, recovery, refrigerant, event, and historical data shows a persistent loss of performance that deserves attention now.

Sample values are for presentation testing only. A published case study will use validated, anonymized PlasmaAudit data and documented outcomes.

What happens at each step

The prediction is built from evidence—not a guess.

01 / MONITOR

Capture full operating context

Dual product probes, air and refrigerant conditions, compressor and condenser activity, doors, defrost, and other freezer conditions enter one operating picture.

02 / CALCULATE

Reveal what raw readings miss

Relationships and derived values—including safety margin, projected Time-to-Limit, superheat, runtime, and cycle behavior—show how the system is actually performing.

03 / COMPARE

Find the change that matters

Current points and calculations are evaluated against the freezer's historical baseline, trends, and recurring patterns to identify meaningful drift.

04 / PREDICT

Create time to act

Developing risk, urgency, and likely causes are organized into clear guidance so teams can plan maintenance before a potential emergency call.

What your team receives

The same evidence, shaped for the person using it.

01

Facility view

Clear status, developing conditions, and the issues that need attention first.

02

Call-center context

Useful evidence for triage before an emergency dispatch or escalation is created.

03

Technician-ready detail

The operating history and signals that make the first field check more informed.

Human in the loop

PlasmaAudit informs. Your team decides.

The initial operating posture is monitoring, analysis, and recommendation—not autonomous equipment control. People remain responsible for service, safety, compliance, and operating decisions.

Walk through the operating flow

Show us how an alarm moves through your team today.

We will map where context is lost, what people need earlier, and how PlasmaAudit can support a more prepared response.

Request a walkthrough